Frankfurt Congregation to Strasbourg Exiles
DATE: 1554 December 3
LOCATION OF ORIGIN: Frankfurt
DESTINATION: Strasbourg
SOURCE: Denbighshire Record Office, Plas Power MSS, DD/PP/839 pp. 41-42
To our louing bretherne & Countremen at Straszburg1
Not in Troubles which begins with 'Grace mercy and peace, &c'. This letter was carried to Strasbourg by Edmund Grindal and Richard Chambers, Troubles xxiiiii. It has a distinctly sharper tone than the previous letters from the Frankfurt congregation which might have been linked to the arrival of John Knox who was the first to sign.
Grace, mercy & peace. As it is2
Troubles has 'was'. ever most true, so at this present we feel most sensibly that wheresoeuer god laithe the foundation to buylde his glorie, ther he continueth till he bring the same to a perfect work.3
Troubles has 'present worke'. All praise & thankes be to him4
Troubles has 'All thanks and praise be vnto him'. therfore, that hath so moved yo[u]r hartes, that in no point you seme5
Troubles has 'so as in no point ye seeme'. to forslow yo[u]r diligence to the fortherance of the same. And as this worke6
Troubles has 'the worke'. is of most excellencie, so thadversiarie ceaseth not7
Troubles has 'the aduersaries cease not'. most craftelye tundermyne it, or at lest throghe false reportes & defacing of the worke begon[n]e to staye the labourers whiche sholde travell in the finishing therof. But truthe euer cleaveth it self: & as the son[n]e consumeth the clowdes, so misreports by triall ar confounded. Our bretherne sent from you can certefie you at lenghe[sic] touchinge the particulars of yo[u]r letters8
ATroubles has 'letter'. A reference to the Strasbourg letter of 23 Nov. 1554, Troubles xxii-iii, brought by Grindal and Chambers., to whom we have in all things agreed which semed expedient for the state of this congregation.
As for certeyne ceremonies which thorder of the contrie will not beare necessarelie we omitt9
Troubles has 'we necessarily omit'. At this stage the Frankfurt congregation were employing the excuse that some 'ceremonies' from the Book of Common Prayer were omitted because they were not acceptable to their host city. with as littell alteration as is possible (which in yo[u]r letters you require)10
Troubles has 'ye require'. so that no adversarie is so impudent, that dare either blame our doctrine of imperfection, or els us of mutabilitie,11
Troubles has 'or vs of mutabilitie'. One of the reasons for not making any changes to the Book of Common Prayer given by Strassburg in their letter of 23 Nov 1554. except he be altogether willfull ignorant, rather sekeing how to finde fault then to amende.12
Troubles has 'finde faultes, then to amend them'. Neither do we dissent from them which lie at the raunson of their blood13
Troubles has 'raunsome of their blouds'. One of the reasons for not making any changes to the Book of Common Prayer given by Strasbourg in their letter of 23 Nov 1554. for the doctrine, wherof they have made a most worthie confesssion. And yet we think not that any godly man will stand to the death in the defence of indifferent ceremonies (which as the book specifieth)14
Troubles has 'in the defence of ceremonies, whiche (as the booke specifiethe)'. The description of ceremonies as 'indifferent' and the assertion that, if necessary, they could be altered, marked a shift in tone. upon iust cawses may be altered & changed. And if the not full using of the book cause the godly to dowte in that trueth wherin before they were persuaded, & to staie their com[m]ing hither according as thei purposed: either it signifieth that they were slenderly taught,15
Troubles has 'very slenderly taught'. A further tonal shift was made here when objections were dismissed as arising from ignorance or misrepresentation. which for breche of a ceremonie will refuse such a singular benefitt: or els that you haue heard them misreported by some false bretherne, who to hinder this worthie enterprise spare not to sowe in every place [p. 42] store of such poor reasons.
Last of all it remayneth, that you writ16
Troubles has 'ye write'. At this point the Frankfurt congregation moved onto the offensive regarding the offer that the Strasbourg exiles would come to Frankfurt on 1 Feb 1555., that ther first of Februarye next ye will come17
Troubles has 'yow will come'. to help to set in ordre & establishe this churche accordingly. Which thing as we most wishe for yo[u]r companies sake & for that ye might see our godly ordre here observed:18
Troubles has 'oure godly orders alreadie here obserued'. so we put you out of doubt, that for to appoint a iorney for thestablishing of any ceremonies19
Troubles has 'off Ceremonies'. shulde be more to your charges & pains than any generall profett,20
Troubles has 'your charges then anie generall profit'. This was a stark warning that the Frankfurt congregation would not accept the imposition of 'ceremonies' by the other exiles. except ye were determyned to remayne with us lenger then tow[sic] monthes, as you writ to our countrimen of Disborogh21
Troubles has 'Densborow'. Duisburg. These letters from Strasbourg to Duisburg and Emden are not extant. The suggestion that the other exiles should stay two months, long enough to establish the 'ceremonies', and then leave, offended the Frankfurt congregation. & Emden. Which letters notwithstanding ar now staied, & as appeareth, we never the nere.
We referr the rest to oure bretherne Mr Chambers and Mr Grindall,22
Troubles has 'Maister Chambers and maister Grindall'. who by their diligent inquisition have learned so farr of our state, as we writt to you23
Troubles has 'wrote vnto yow'. in our former letters. That is that we haue a churche freely graunted, to preache godes worde purely, to minister the sacramentes sincerely, & to execute discipline truelie.24
Discipline was explicitly included as a third mark by which a true church could be recognised, compared to the two marks in John Scory's letter, 3 Sept 1554, DD/PP/839 31-2. And as touchinge our booke we will practise it so farr as Godes worde doth assure it & the state of this countrey permitt.25
This formulation turns round the more conciliatory phrasing at the start of the letter by saying that the Book of Common Prayer will be followed where it has the assurance of God's Word and the permission of the host city. Fare ye well. From thenglishe congregation at Franckford26
Troubles only has 'At Franckf.' this 3o Decemb. (1554)
Your loving brethrne27
Troubles has 'louinge frinds' and the list in a different order which also includes William Kethe.
| John Knoxe | John Stanton | Michael Gill | |
| John Foxe | John Hollingam | William Walton | |
| John Mackebray | Tho(mas) Kent | John Sanford | |
| John Bale | Geo(rge) Whetenhall | Edmund Sutton | |
| Tho(mas) Wood | Tho(mas) Whetenhall | William Whittingham | |
| Will. Williams |
1 Not in Troubles which begins with 'Grace mercy and peace, &c'. This letter was carried to Strasbourg by Edmund Grindal and Richard Chambers, Troubles xxiiiii. It has a distinctly sharper tone than the previous letters from the Frankfurt congregation which might have been linked to the arrival of John Knox who was the first to sign.
2 Troubles has 'was'.
3 Troubles has 'present worke'.
4 Troubles has 'All thanks and praise be vnto him'.
5 Troubles has 'so as in no point ye seeme'.
6 Troubles has 'the worke'.
7 Troubles has 'the aduersaries cease not'.
8 Troubles has 'letter'. A reference to the Strasbourg letter of 23 Nov. 1554, Troubles xxii-iii, brought by Grindal and Chambers.
9 Troubles has 'we necessarily omit'. At this stage the Frankfurt congregation were employing the excuse that some 'ceremonies' from the Book of Common Prayer were omitted because they were not acceptable to their host city.
10 Troubles has 'ye require'.
11 Troubles has 'or vs of mutabilitie'. One of the reasons for not making any changes to the Book of Common Prayer given by Strassburg in their letter of 23 Nov 1554.
12 Troubles has 'finde faultes, then to amend them'.
13 Troubles has 'raunsome of their blouds'. One of the reasons for not making any changes to the Book of Common Prayer given by Strasbourg in their letter of 23 Nov 1554.
14 Troubles has 'in the defence of ceremonies, whiche (as the booke specifiethe)'. The description of ceremonies as 'indifferent' and the assertion that, if necessary, they could be altered, marked a shift in tone.
15 Troubles has 'very slenderly taught'. A further tonal shift was made here when objections were dismissed as arising from ignorance or misrepresentation.
16 Troubles has 'ye write'. At this point the Frankfurt congregation moved onto the offensive regarding the offer that the Strasbourg exiles would come to Frankfurt on 1 Feb 1555.
17 Troubles has 'yow will come'.
18 Troubles has 'oure godly orders alreadie here obserued'.
19 Troubles has 'off Ceremonies'.
20 Troubles has 'your charges then anie generall profit'. This was a stark warning that the Frankfurt congregation would not accept the imposition of 'ceremonies' by the other exiles.
21 Troubles has 'Densborow'. Duisburg. These letters from Strasbourg to Duisburg and Emden are not extant. The suggestion that the other exiles should stay two months, long enough to establish the 'ceremonies', and then leave, offended the Frankfurt congregation.
22 Troubles has 'Maister Chambers and maister Grindall'.
23 Troubles has 'wrote vnto yow'.
24 Discipline was explicitly included as a third mark by which a true church could be recognised, compared to the two marks in John Scory's letter, 3 Sept 1554, DD/PP/839 31-32.
25 This formulation turns round the more conciliatory phrasing at the start of the letter by saying that the Book of Common Prayer will be followed where it has the assurance of God's Word and the permission of the host city.
26 Troubles only has 'At Franckf.'
27 Troubles has 'louinge frinds' and the list in a different order which also includes William Kethe.

